Is Governance Aligned with Rhetoric? Exploring the Board Composition of Leading Transnational NGOs

Authors

  • George E. Mitchell Baruch College, City University of New York
  • Peter H. Nerothin San Diego State University
  • Megan B. Pontes Arizona State University
  • Hans Peter Schmitz North Carolina State University
  • Caroline Walsh University of San Diego

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.3ygfac21

Keywords:

Governance, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, NGOs, Board Composition

Abstract

Transnational NGOs (TNGOs) often claim to speak and act on behalf of diverse communities, yet many are governed by boards that may not reflect the sector’s rhetorical commitments to inclusive governance. This apparent gap between rhetoric and practice has led to growing pressure for leading TNGOs to engage in governance reforms. This exploratory article evaluates the composition of the boards of 25 leading TNGOs in the United States with a combined 395 board members to assess the extent to which this rhetoric is associated with board composition. A latent class analysis of board member data measuring demographic, competency, and cognitive background indicators identifies a distinction between “inclusive” and “traditional” board types. We find that the inclusive board type is associated with rhetorical commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion, whereas the traditional board type is not. We conclude with recommendations for research to inform TNGO governance reforms. 

Downloads

Published

— Updated on 2024-12-11

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
     
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional, contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see, The Effect of Open Access).